Search for: "GENERAL MOTORS LLC, a Foreign Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
General Motors, LLC, No. 2012-CV-6092 (C.P. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
If the answer to the question is “yes,” then where Company C is a foreign corporation it cannot compel Company A to arbitrate and it faces the substantial risks and costs of litigating in an American (or perhaps a foreign) court instead of the generally more streamlined procedures available in arbitration. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The syllabus is constructed with these general ideas in mind. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:29 pm
., industrial company history, that being General Motors Corporation. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Such registration statutes were almost always intended to confer no more than “specific jurisdiction” – allowing state residents to sue registered foreign corporation over their in-state activities. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 8:32 am
MHL TEK, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
” BCL § 1319 provides that BCL § 626, the statute governing shareholder derivative actions, “shall apply to a foreign corporation doing business in this state, its directors, officers and shareholders. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
” Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
Baby you CA drive my KA General Court judgment in Ford Motor Company v OHIM, Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
Clouser, an Attorney in McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC's Labor & Employment Practice Group in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
Global Global – General Corporate business leaders: Want to create value from your IP? [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:12 am
Posted by Sung Hui Kim, UCLA School of Law, on Tuesday, May 24, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Compliance & ethics, Confidentiality, General counsel, General Motors, Information environment,Inside counsel, Inside information, Management, Misconduct Antitrust Executive Order and Common Ownership Posted by Brad S. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
: General Motors LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
Trimble is a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in N.D. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 4:42 pm
Can China prohibit General Motors, which does business in China, from selling its Brazilian subsidiary? [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
Bell Hill Vineyards, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STENTALLOY for alloys used to make medical devices: In re Metalwerks PMD, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Boston Red Sox - Red Sox and White Sox oppose e.SOX for cellphone sleeves: Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership and Chicago White Sox, Ltd. v. [read post]
